Tollinchi “ne peut etre exclu” that Elisabeth’s leaving (to escape her abuser), may well have caused his “unproven” prostate, bladder, liver and kidney cancer……
Je vous informe que la situation personnelle et financière de mon Client va rapidement évoluer défavorablement dans les semaines et mois à venir.[,
En effet, me transmettant des éléments médicaux, que je produirai, ce dernier m’informe être malade en l’état de résultats d’examen pour l’heure défavorables (prostate, vessie, avec tâches suspectes foie et reins).
Un cancer est fortement suspecté dont mon Client ignore, le cas échéant, le stade.
L’état intense de stress dans lequel mon Client se trouve depuis le départ soudain du domicile de Madame DAO LENA ne peut être exclu parmi les causes et facteurs d’une telle pathologie si elle devait être définitivement confirmée.
Alexandre Guilaume Tollinchi
I am writing to inform you that my client's personal and financial situation is expected to deteriorate rapidly in the coming weeks and months.
Indeed, he has provided me with medical information, which I will provide, informing me that he is currently ill, with unfavourable test results (prostate, bladder, with suspicious lesions on the liver and kidneys). Cancer is strongly suspected, although my client is unaware of its stage, if any.
The intense stress my client has been experiencing since Ms. DAO LENA's sudden departure from his home cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor to such an illness, should it be definitively confirmed.
ANALYSIS
That is the hallmark of someone who wants to hurt, intimidate, and control, not just argue a case. It is not neutral legal writing. It is a designed insinuation
The psychological traits of the author of this this letter / email suggests are:
1. Emotional sadism
He appears willing to exploit the most frightening possible allegation to wound its recipient. Invoking possible cancer in this way is not just aggressive; it is cruel.
2. Manipulativeness
The wording is slippery. “Cannot be excluded” is the language of someone planting poison while trying to avoid responsibility for saying it outright.
3. Bullying instinct
The whole structure says: you will now carry fear, blame, and pressure. It is written to overwhelm, not enlighten.
4. Abusive psychology
This is very consistent with abusive dynamics: take an event, recast oneself as the victim, and make the other person responsible for catastrophic harm. That is a form of coercive blame-shifting.
5. Moral opportunism
Even if his client is genuinely ill, using that illness to suggest its recipient may have caused cancer without evidence is morally rotten. It treats suffering as leverage.
6. Lack of boundaries
A decent person, even in conflict, would understand there is a line. This crosses it. It drags medicine, fear, and implied guilt into a legal dispute in a way that feels invasive and degrading.
It reads like the work of a bully. And more than that, it reads like someone comfortable with psychological abuse — someone who does not just want advantage, but wants the recipient to feel contaminated by blame.